|
Monday October 20, 2008 ~ 8 Comments
Donna and I returned from Europe last night. I will tell a bit more about our time there in the coming days. If you are so inclined, you can find some interesting pictures at Twitter). When Donna an I talked on the plane coming home (faces 11 inches apart), we were struck by how these church planters live incarnationally. Europe was their home-- and they were seeking to live sent on God's mission. When we went to the Vatican, we did not find it to be a spiritual experience. It spoke to us, but not about faith. It spoke to us of power. It did not evoke "go and tell." Rather, it was clearly "come and see." (And, that same sentence would be true in many non-Catholic settings as well-- including a few I know all too well.) We taked some about the contrast of "being sent" and "maintaining structure" in a Bible study with Threads called Sent: Living the Missional Nature of the Church. In Session 3 of the study, I tried to use an illustration of a yo-yo to describe how a church should constantly be pushing outward into its surrounding culture. The logic goes like this. Most of us have a Constantinian model for church which, very simply, is summed up like this: building + clergy + program = church. We saw it quite clearly in St. Peter's Basicillica. The fallacy comes when we start to see those components as rules rather than tools-- that was clearly found at the Vatican but is often found in my church and denomination as well. When you create a system with God-given tools, then turn them into rules, you end up with a system that needs to be serviced not a mission that needs to be lived. A better equation is this: body + mission + kingdom = church. We need to be a body on mission for the Kingdom. The session goes onto explain: The biggest disparity between the two models can be seen in the focus. In the Constantinian model, the force is centripetal, moving inward. In the biblical model, the force is centrifugal, pushing outward... Now there is certainly a balance to this argument, but for far too long we have been dominated by the thickness of the string. So we tend to look in rather than looking out.
Be sure to drop by the other posts to follow along on Europe missions week: Post 1: Why We Are In Europe. Post 2: Vision and Video from Europe. Post 3: Planting in Budapest and Beyond. Post 4: More Video and Info on Central and Eastern Europe. Post 5: Teaching English and Telling the Gospel. And find out more about Sent by going here. Posted on October 20, 2008 at 8:14 AM ~ 8 Comments Tagged with: centrifugal, centripetal, church, mission, sent, threads 8 CommentsLeave a comment |
























Thank you Ed for the reports, pictures, insights and advocacy. Always reading and praying, Stan
Great analysis Ed, as always. Good stuff.
keep the blogs and the updates coming...love it.
Love it; I know this is a point you've made in some of your books on missional church planting, but it can't be said enough.
Hi Ed,
Awesome stuff. Thanks for your ministry and writings. I dont know if you ever read these comments but your book (Planting Missional Churches) has been highly influencial in my journey to plant in Boston. Thanks for your heart for the Kingdom, scripture, and reproducing churches.
Matt
(The kid who you told to "sober up" at Catalyst) haha. I wonder if Driscoll gave you an ear full for that yet. haha.
mwchewning@yahoo.com
www.chewningjourney.blogspot.com
Spot-on, Ed. I have thought in my head what you articulated so well, hearing this phrase in my mind "The Holy Roman Catholic Baptist Church" whenever I sense the string on the yo-yo getting thick. Your insights fuel my passion for planting...
Blessings - Doran
Love that new equation, Ed!
body + mission + kingdom = church
Excellent.
Good to see you in person at Catalyst.
It seems that someplace along the way church as become a goal, and we have forgotten that it is a tool.
The irony about it being a goal is that if we only have a few ineffective Christians in the pews we are failing...but if we have a lot of ineffective Christians attending, we are succeeding - we have meet our goal.
When does it become a tool again, for training and equipping for reaching the world that lives outside the walls of the church?
Scott