|
Monday January 19, 2009 ~ 6 Comments
Leadership Network commissioned me and a team I put together to research the state of church planting in North America. The findings are encouraging, while pointing out we still have a long way to go. The State of Church Planting in North America is a four-part report: Church Planting Overview, Who Starts New Churches, Improving the Health and Survivability of New Churches, and Funding New Churches. Below are some highlights from the Church Planting Overview, but you will want to download all of the reports. You can download the study in its entirety here via the American Society of Church Growth Journal. You can also download a podcast we did related to the study. Summary North American Christians are interested in church planting in a way not seen for many decades. In response, Leadership Network commissioned a research project that surveyed over 200 churchplanting churches, more than 100 denominational leaders from dozens of denominations, and over 45 church planting networks. The study revealed four interesting current realities. Though tracking the number of new churches is difficult because so many new churches are connected to and claimed by multiple partnering entities, Leadership Network says we are planting about 4,000 new churches a year. This is an all time high. We Are Cooperating More Broadly A second discovery from Leadership Network's research shows that this generation's church planting organizations display a heart of cooperation and resource. Free on-line tools abound--denominational training manuals, research papers, how-to articles, as well as audio and video training. This cooperation indicates an obvious "kingdom mentality" in the church planting community that expands beyond denomination or regional allegiances.
At this point the most "successful church planting seems to be moving quickly from denominational structures to hands-on local churches and networks." This does not mean Denominations are uninvolved. In fact church planting is on the rise within denominations. But the majority of successful church plants are plugged into networks, and even denominations are partnering with networks as they seek to establish new churches. We Are Learning to Be More Evangelistically Effective Today there is an increasing emphasis on systems that will produce better and more consistent results in church planting. These systems include recruitment, assessment, training, coaching, prayer, and funding.
The state of church planting in the U.S. is diverse, sophisticated, and yet by many measures stronger than ever. Yet, we have still not witnessed a true church planting movement to this date.
As always your comments (yep, even the few bad ones) make this blog more interesting. So share your thoughts in the comments. Posted on January 19, 2009 at 6:00 PM ~ 6 Comments Tagged with: church planting, data, future, leadership, movement, north america, research, study 6 CommentsLeave a comment |























Ed, Thanks for sharing this and I look forward to reading it. A quick question:
Q: Did your study look into any stats on CP's among international ethnics in America?
As an M pastor with a focus on ethnic groups I am really anxious to find material on CP's among the many UPG's coming to America.
Unless older more established churches fully engage, and as you wrote in "Planting Missional Churches", become Antioch churches...sending churches, then the movement will never coalesce the way we would like it too. I am here in downtown Atlanta, and just getting a conversation with some of these guys out in the burbs to tell them what can happen in the city is an uphill battle. That's not a jab, just a fact. They have to become interested in the city, where culture is made, and support the missionary's willing to invest their lives there.
Ed,
I wonder how this information would compare to the church planting model at IMB which is mainly house churches?
I read the section of the study on house churches, but it seems to me that the most successful house church planting entity has been our own IMB with more than 25K of them planted last year.
Also, do you foresee a time when other official SBC entities, such as NAMB, will actively promote our churches planting house churches? House church planting seems to be a lot less expensive than our traditional approach to church planting.
Thanks for your insights.
Les
Ed,
Given your 10 criteria for movements, where are we falling short in cultivating a movement of church planting in the US? Which areas are the weakest?
Jonathan
Ken,
It included ethnic work, but did not focus on that. We are doing a project on that right now.
Les,
NAMB did that a few years ago but it became controversial and I don't think the emphasize it as much now.
Jonathan,
Great question. But I need to think on that.
Ed
Ed here are my thoughts on Church Planting/ Missional Movement:
COMPONENTS OF A MISSIONAL MOVEMENT
In meditating on the idea of “Movement” here are some ideas:
A Movement has/ is…
1. Central Focus… “This ONE thing I do” (Hedgehog Principle)
2. Passion (Leader and Members)
3. Principle Driven (Practices may need to change from location to location)
4. Reproduces itself (Developmental in nature- develops its own reproducing leadership)
5. Continues on for generations (2 Tim. 2:1-2)
6. Cooperates with likeminded groups
7. Retains a tight focus on priorities
8. Is driven by results (can be measured)
The Churches/ Campuses/ Satellites that we develop need to be a part of missional movement and need to reflect most if not all the above principles if we are to develop a movement for the long haul.
Otherwise they will become a drag on the movement of the model. Over time too many drags on the model kill the movement.
I see a post here that mentions your 10 criteria...