A list of the Top 100 Church Blogs have been posted by Kent Shaffer at Church Relevance. This little corner of the blogosphere came in at #23 (up from #39 last time) so we are celebrating around LifeWay Research today and wondering if we get a prize. ;-)

Kent explains that he chose 181 well known blogs, collected data from each blog (Alexa Rank, Compete Visitors, Google PageRank, Google Reader Subscribers, Technorati Authority, and Technorati InLinks), and then ranked them in comparison to the others. A composite rank for each blog is determined by averaging each blogs ranking from the 6 measured criteria. Kent is up front about his method, that he chose some of the well known blogs, and asks for input regarding those he's missing. Yet, I have seen some unhappy bloggers out there.

I just came across the National Congregation Study Wave II via the Christian Post and it's definitely worth noting. This study, directed by Mark Chaves, Professor of Sociology, Religion, and Divinity at Duke University, compared over 1,505 congregations in 2006-2007 with 1,234 in 1998 revealing some noteworthy changes American churches have experienced in the last 10 years. Here a few points worth thinking about.

Style
The study shows that our American churches have become less formal in worship style over the past 10 years. "More worship services include drums, jumping and shouting or dancing, raising hands in praise, calling out "amen," visual projection equipment, applause, and speaking by people other than leaders compared to 1998, the National Congregations Study shows."

These stylistic changes have not robbed or replaced the biblical components of worship. The Christian Post summarizes, "But the numbers for some features have remained about the same, including a sermon... singing, greeting time, silent prayer or meditation, reading or reciting Scripture." So worship tends to still include preaching, praying and singing while our churches adapt to a very interactive and tech-driven culture.

Tech
I've blogged on the issue of tech in the church on several occasions (here for example), and while we should always be intentional and careful when adopting new practices, as pointed out above much of what this study revealed was the embrace of tech culture-- not the abandonment of biblical components of worship.

In 1998, the number of congregations with Web sites was only 17 percent. The number has since risen to 44 percent in 2006-07. In other words, since 1998 another 10,000 congregations created Web sites and now 74 percent of service attendees are in congregations with Web sites.

Meanwhile, the number of those using email to communicate with members increased from 21 percent to 59 percent during this time period. Nearly 80 percent of attendees as of 2006-07 are in congregations that communicate with members via email.

While it's hard to imagine church life in 2009 without websites and electronic communication, 10 years ago it simply wasn't an issue.

Ethnic Diversity
Simply put, our churches are more ethnically diverse today than they were even 10 years ago. More specifically, "the diversity occurred mostly among white churches; the majority of black churches still remain predominantly racially homogeneous."

Age of Leadership
Yet while cultural diversity becomes more of a reality in our churches (a very good thing), leadership in American churches appears to be aging. With all the talk about younger leaders and church planters this is not what some would expect.

The median age of the head clergy has increased from 49 in 1998 to 53 in 2006. Furthermore, congregations across the religious spectrum have fewer younger leaders. Today, only 39 percent of congregations are led by someone 50 years old or younger, a drop from 48 percent in 1998.

Size of Congregation
Also worth noting, in the midst of all this change, is that the median congregation is the same size today as it was in 1998 (75 participants). Additionally, "the median person still attends a congregation that is the same size as it was in 1998 (400 regular participants)."

This study is broad, including all kinds of congregations. You can find more information at the Christian Post's article, or you can go directly to the study at Duke University.

I've spent some time with Mark and consider him a solid researcher and I believe the research is well done and helpful.

Eric Redmond, whom I have mentioned before, gets some good press on the front page of the Washington Post.

You can read the whole article here. I have excerpted parts of the Post article, along with a couple of other articles, and made some comments therein.

The Post explained:

Faced with a crisis of aging and departing members, the nation's largest non-Catholic Christian bodies -- Southern Baptists, United Methodists, Lutherans and Presbyterians -- are reaching out to minorities in ways they never have before.

Yet, while local churches often remain predominately black or white, the outreach does result in a more diverse national organization.

I don't disagree with the thesis of the introduction. I think many denominations are facing a decline and are reaching out aggressively to non-Anglos, though I am not sure the decline is the motivation. At least in the case of the SBC, "language,�? "ethnic,�? and "black�? ministry dates back decades to when the SBC was growing rapidly. Most denominations have been focusing on increasing diversity for decades.

However, the increase of diversity is important when discussing decline, growth, etc. If you were to remove the ethnic and African American growth from the SBC totals, the denomination would have been in numerical decline for several years. (I think we are in decline already, but churches report inflated numbers and report a category that is a mystery to me, "non-resident members.")

More from the article:

But of all the denominations seeking to diversify, many agree that the Southern Baptist Convention -- an association of about 40,000 congregations that make up the nation's largest Protestant denomination -- has the farthest to travel.

Having just completed a church planting study of all major denominations for Leadership Network, I can tell you that is an overstatement. There are some VERY white denominations out there (and other monocultural denominations that are not white). My denomination has some some of the worst history, but if diversity is measured by the number of churches (and that is the standard the article uses), we have made more progress than most. For that matter, I would say that most denominations in our study found their plants to be much more ethnically and racially diverse than their denominations as a whole.